BABYLON

In fact, it's almost impossible to discuss 'Babylon' in general without making frequent comparisons to his infamous almost-Best Picture Academy Award winner. Many have coined 'Babylon' as 'La La Land's' deformed, cocaine-addled older cousin, a Hollywood suicide note to 'La La Land's' love letter. Manny repeatedly voices his desire to be "a part of something bigger," hinting at the immortality that only the silver screen can provide - and while his intentions seem far purer than others, we still actively pity him. Where Chazelle's protagonists are historically perfectionists driven to the brink by their ambition, 'Babylon's' main characters feel far more aimless; a menagerie of extremely damaged lost souls who commonly use the arts as an anchor because they have nothing else. This is exactly why Nellie and Manny bond - she has no real family, and the family she does have exploits her, and he's an immigrant whose identity becomes blurred in the flurry of Hollywood social climbing. Thankfully, Manny manages to avoid the pitfalls of similar characters we've seen before, but only because his love for Nellie forces to be her foil and in turn he cannot let himself slip. If Nellie was more well-adjusted, Manny would be snorting coke off a dancer's boobs and getting into gambling debt like everyone else.

Furthermore, where 'La La Land's' protagonists Mia and Sebastian seemed to have the world waiting for them to dominate, the possibilities for 'Babylon's' characters feel far more limited despite the technological boom they're living through. Perhaps this comes from their active ignorance of the fallible nature of humanity in every element of their lives, from the amount of drugs they take to their lack of sleep, fuelled by their larger-than-life personas (and the physical size of their big-screen selves). Of course, it wouldn't be a Chazelle film without a character whose ambition is their defining trait, and while Manny's ambition sees him serve as more of a stand-in for Chazelle than as an audience stand-in, he's the closest thing we get to a functioning, normal human being in the film. For the first 45 minutes, we rarely hear Manny say anything; he simply stands there and lets the insanity of the world he's entered wash over him. The notion that Chazelle is way too sincere of a filmmaker to tackle this kind of story given his reputation as the clean-cut nice guy is very valid, but his more cynical streak has been present since J.K. Simmons threw a chair at Miles Teller's head in 2014's 'Whiplash'. Through Manny (and unintentionally through his own public persona), Chazelle feels like the nerd who never got invited to big parties, trying to imagine what those parties are like, and going so overboard that the whole thing comes off looking more like a nightmare than a dream. Simply through its graphic, bombastic nature, 'Babylon' feels like a sudden left turn when it is, in fact, a very natural thematic progression for Chazelle as a filmmaker, and although it is on the surface his funniest film, it's also by far his saddest – and I don't just mean the tragic endings many of its characters face. Of course, with all of this narrative upheaval going on, it's up to the technical elements to help tie 'Babylon' to Chazelle's brand, and his long-time partners, cinematographer Linus Sandgren and editor Tom Cross, sadly feel like they are on autopilot. Save for one excellent scene in which Nellie laboriously shoots her first film with sound, there's nothing here that we haven't already seen in a Chazelle film before – and sometimes those previous examples are far superior to their 'Babylon' counterparts.

I will warn you now, dear readers; while I was strapped in and ready for whatever challenges it threw at me, 'Babylon' definitely will not be for everyone – just ask the mass of viewers who walked out of my screening with 15 minutes to go, clearly unimpressed with the film's unnecessarily repeated coda. Chazelle has been known to wear his passions on his sleeve, but 'Babylon's' overreliance on motifs from 'Singin' in the Rain' and 'Boogie Nights' (an inspiration he has discussed multiple times) is often to its detriment. For many, the reminders of these films may have them wishing they were just watching those films instead. Furthermore, it's impossible to dive into Sidney's story without exploring the implications of being a black man in a predominantly white industry, and while Chazelle – a white man – wisely refuses to involve himself in that narrative by not engaging with it, it doesn't mean that Sidney's storyline feels any less undercooked. If only he remembered the value of non-holistic storytelling for the film's final moments: a mishmash of clips from major cinematic technical milestones that feels incredibly out of place. I understand that the film clearly wants to go out with a bang, but I cannot stress how jarring it is to watch a montage jump across history from 1952 (the year in which the final scene takes place) to clips of modern films such as 2009's 'Avatar'.

While 'Babylon' struggles to remain a consistently knockout experience, the simple fact that I still don't feel like I've scratched the surface on what this film has to offer should be enough to intrigue you. It's rare that directors are given the budget and resources to do whatever they want and tell original stories, and it's something we should all be supporting and championing. Not everyone will love 'Babylon', but everyone should sure as hell respect it.